Abstract

The study that is present the observed impact of parental and social stress on people’ perceptions regarding cross-cultural and interfaith relationship and wedding. The concerns of great interest had been: (1) what’s the impact of parental attitudes towards interfaith and cross-cultural relationships? (2) how can the individuals feel it impacts upon them? Not only that, (3) How do the individuals predict they will react to their children’s range of such relationships? Fifty-five college pupils with diverse backgrounds took part in this research. The findings suggest that almost all the individuals were affected by the social stress placed upon them. Furthermore, the individuals observed the generation that is previous “racist”. Nevertheless, interestingly you will find signs of an attitude shift that is generational. Finally, the findings reveal that over 80 per cent of this individuals failed to desire to interfere within their children’s partner selection. The residual 20 per cent had been against interfaith and dating that is cross-cultural marriages.

This really is a preview of membership content, access via your organization.

Access choices

Purchase article that is single

Access immediately to your article PDF that is full.

Tax calculation shall be finalised during checkout.

Contribute to journal

Immediate on line access to any or all presssing dilemmas from 2019. Subscription will auto renew yearly.

Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Records

It must be noted that relationship is generally speaking perhaps perhaps not acceptable within the Arab and community that is muslim others) unless the couple’s intention would be to date solely (but, specific limitations may nevertheless use, e.g., limiting intimate tasks) and with the try to get hitched. More over, in many cases, the approval of this female’s daddy ( or any other significant male figure) is necessary to enable this relationship to transpire. This matter was addressed through the number of the information in purchase to respect individuals’ social traditions and observing that is religious.

Recommendations

Berger, C. R. (1979). Beyond initial relationship: Uncertainty, understanding, and also the growth of social relationships. In H. Giles & R. St. Clair (Eds.), Language and social therapy (pp. 122–144). Oxford: Blackwell.

Berger, C. R. (2005). Interpersonal interaction: Theoretical perspectives, future leads. Journal of correspondence, 55(3), 415–447.

Binder, J., Zagefka, H., Brown, R., Funke, F., Kessler, T., Mummendey, A., et al. (2009). Does contact reduce prejudice or does prejudice reduce contact? a longitudinal test associated with the contact theory among bulk and minority teams in three countries in europe. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(4), 843.

Boker, A. (2008). Kiryat Gat: Racist campaign against Bedouin guys dating Jewish females. nana10. Retrieved December 31, 2013, from http://news.nana10.co.il/Article/?ArticleID=563227.

Bost, S. (2010). Mulattas and mestizas: Representing mixed identities in the Americas, 1850–2000. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.

Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Changing qualitative information: Thematic analysis and rule development. Ny, NY: Sage.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in therapy. Qualitative analysis in Psychology, 3, 77–101.

Cila, J., & Lalonde, R. N. (2013). Private openness toward interfaith dating and wedding among Muslim teenagers: The part of religiosity, social identification, and family members connectedness. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations. doi:10.1177/1368430213502561.

Cohen, A. B. (2009). Numerous types of tradition. United states Psychologist, 64, 194–204.

Dion, K. K., & Dion, K. L. (1993). Individualistic and collectivistic views on gender as well as the social context of love and closeness. Journal of Social problems, 49, 53–59.

Driscoll, R., Davis, K. E., & Lipetz, M. E. (1972). Parental disturbance and love that is romantic the Romeo and Juliet effect. Journal of Personality and Social Structure, 24, 1–10.

Eggert, L. L., & Parks, M. R. (1987). Correspondence community participation in adolescents’ friendships and intimate relationships. Correspondence Yearbook, 10, 283–322.

Espiritu, Y. L. (2001). “We don’t rest around like White girls do”: Family, culture, and sex in Filipina American life. Indication, 26, 415–440.

Etcheverry, P. E., Le, B., & Hoffman, N. G. (2012). Predictors of buddy approval for intimate relationships. Personal Relationships, 4, 1–15.

Felmlee, D. (2003). Connection in internet sites. In J. Delamater (Ed.), Handbook of social therapy (pp. 389–409). Nyc: Plenum.

Felmlee, D., & Sprecher, S. (2000). Romantic lovers’ perceptions of social networking features utilizing the passing of some time relationship transitions. Personal Relationships, 7, 325–340.

Goetz, J., & LeCompte, M. (1984). Ethnography and qualitative design in academic research. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

Harris, T. M., & Kalbfleisch, P. J. (2000). Interracial dating: The implications of battle for starting a relationship that is romantic. Howard Journal of Communications, 11, 49–64.

Hollingshead, A. B. (1950). Social factors within the variety of wedding mates. United States Sociological Review, 15, 619–627.

Kalmijn, M. (1998). Homogamy and intermarriage: Causes, patterns, styles. Yearly Review of Sociology, 395–421.

Lasson, K. (2008). Bloodstains for a Code of Honor: The Murderous Marginalization of females in the Islamic World. Women’s Rights Law Reporter, 30, 407.

Lewis, R. (1973). Personal effect together with development of dyads: An interactionist approach to mate selection. Sociometry, 34, 409–418.

Madek, C. A. (2005). Killing dishonor: Effective eradication of honor killing. Suffolk Transnational Law Review, 29, 53.

Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to develop and implementation. London: Wiley.

Moore, R. M. (2000). An exploratory research of interracial dating on a tiny university campus. Sociological Viewpoints, 16, 46–64.

Parks, M. R., & Adelman, M. B. (1983). Correspondence sites in addition to growth of intimate relationships: An expansion of doubt decrease concept. Human Correspondence Analysis, 10, 55–79.

Parks, M. R., & Adelman, M. B. (1983). Correspondence systems together with growth of intimate relationships: An expansion of doubt decrease concept. Human Correspondence Analysis, 10(1), 55–79.

Reich, W. A., Ramos, J. M., & Jaipal, R. (2000). Cultural identity and interethnic dating in Portuguese adults that are young. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 153–161.

Sprecher, S. (1988). Investment model, equity, and support that is social of relationship dedication. Personal Psychology Quarterly, 51, 318–328.

Sprecher, S. (2011). The impact of internet sites on intimate relationships: Through the lens associated with the social networking. Personal Relationships, 18(4), 630–644.

Telles, E. E., & Sue, C. A. (2009). Race combination: Boundary crossing in relative viewpoint. Sociology, 35(1), 129.

Weiss, R. S. (1994). Learning from strangers: The art and types of qualitative meeting studies. Ny: The Complimentary Press.

Yahya, S., Bekerman, Z., Sagy, S., & Boag, S. (2012). Whenever training fulfills conflict: Palestinian and Jewish–Israeli parental attitudes towards comfort education that is promoting. Journal of Peace Education, 9, 297–320.

Yahya S., & Boag S. (under review-a). Factors affecting attitudes towards cross-cultural and dating that is interfaith wedding. Marriage and Family Review.

Yahya S., & Boag S. (under review-b). “Sadly, not totally all love affairs are designed to be…” Attitudes towards interfaith and cross-cultural relationship and marriages in http://besthookupwebsites.org/eurodate-review/ an area that is conflict-ridden. Center East Journal.